Impact of Digital Technologies in Student Engagement and Learning at Academic Institutions with Special Reference to B– Schools

Sunil Kr. Pandey ., Pooja S. Kushwaha ., Sanchita Ghatak .

Abstract


Digital technologies have taken over the dominant form of classroom and informal study. Using digital technologies each day will help to gain knowledge understand concepts and learn new ways of seeing the things around them. The two key components of our study are digital learning and student engagement with digital technology. Digital media empowers new types of learning, development and deployment in all types of educational environment .On the other hand it also provides exposure. The research paper provides a framework comprising of digital learning and student engagement in an academic institute. It also studies the benefits of this model for the internal and external end users. To explore more about how digital technology could enhance student engagement and learning, we examined current background research literature, practices and B-School log reports. This research was enriched by collaboration with faculties who worked on data management from different B-Schools.


Keywords


Digital Technologies, Digital Learning, E-Learning, Learning models

Full Text:

PDF

References


Richardson, W. (2008). Educational Leadership: Giving Students Ownership of Learning: Footprints in the Digital Age. ASCD, 66(3), 16-19.

Fathema, N. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to report web technology adoption behavior in higher education institutions (Ph.D thesis).Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States

Yuen, A. K., & Ma, W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of E-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.

Gee, J.P. (2005b) Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5–16.

Groff, J., Haas, J., Klopfer, E., & Osterweil, S. (2009). Using the Technology of Today in the Classroom Today. Cambridge, MA: The Education Arcade, MIT.

Smith, B. K., & Blankinship, E. (2000). Justifying imagery: multimedia support for learning through exploration. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3/4), 749-768.

Teclehaimanot, B. (2006). Technology use in an urban setting: Implications for school change. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006, 1837-1847. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C. (2008). Academic and student use of a LMS: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 30-41.

Willms, J. D. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A sense of belonging and participation. OECD: Programme for International Student Assessment. Available:http://www.edmeasurementsurveys.com/QM/StudentEngagementOECDWillms.pdf

Delialioglu, O. & Yildirim Z. (2007). Students' perceptions on effective dimensions of Interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133-146.

Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244.

Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761-774. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Editorial Office:

Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,
S.N. 21, Plot No 24, Mirza Ghalib Road Malegaon Nasik,
Maharashtra India - 423203.
+919764558895 (whatsapp),
editor@scholarshub.net, www.scholarshub.net

Copyrights © 2010-2020 - ERM Publications, India     

This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/