Exploring the Relationship between Youth Leadership and Sustainability with Mediation Effects from an Indian Perspective using Path Way Analysis

Dr. Archana Singh ., Dr. Roshan Kazi ., Anita Patankar .

Abstract


Youth are agents of upcoming changes who through their knowledge, intense observation and perpetual action can face challenges that would help build a sustainable India. The revolutions that stimulate true youth leadership are nourished by being absorbed in the values and practices of a more sustainable way of living. The purpose of the paper is to study the impact of youth leadership on sustainability and the mediation effect of youth association, youth environmentalism, youth activism and youth governance and the relation between youth leadership and sustainable India. The study is descriptive in nature and cross sectional in time dimension. Responses are gathered from NGO’s that engage youth. A theoretical model linking youth association, youth environmentalism, youth activism and youth governance and the relation between youth leadership and sustainable India is empirically tested using path analysis. The results of path analysis have revealed that youth leadership has a positive impact on sustainability. Further, youth association, youth environmentalism, youth activism and youth governance are partial mediators of the relationship between youth leadership and sustainability. This paper contributes to the existing literature by proposing a framework of the interrelationships of the factors affecting good governance and sustainability of India by the involvement of youth.


Keywords


Youth leadership, sustainability, path analysis and governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akerlund, K.M. (2000). Prevention program sustainability: the state’s perspective, Journal of Community Psychology, pp.353–362

Anderson, A.R. (1998). Cultivating the Garden of Eden: environmental entrepreneuring, Journal of Organizational Change Management, pp.135–144 [online]

Berardi, U. (2013). Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems, Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp.1573–1591

Birmingham, D. and Barton, C.A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: youth taking educated action on socio scientific issues, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, pp. 286–314, doi: 10.1002/tea.21127.

Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2002). Young people's time perspectives: from youth to adulthood. Sociology, 36(3), 513-537.

Brungardt, C.L. (1998). The new face of leadership: implications for higher education, Leadership Studies, Fort Hays State University

Calsyn, R.J. and Kenny, D.A. (1977). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: cause or effect of academic achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 2, p.136.

Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2004). The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 771-799.

Côté, J. E. (2002). The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualization thesis examined. Journal of youth studies, 5(2), 117-134.

Frank, K. I. (2006). The potential of youth participation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 351-371.

Galston, W. A. (2004). Civic education and political participation. Political Science and Politics, 37(02), 263-266.

Gambone, M.A., Yu, H.C., Sipe, C.L. and Lacoe, J. (2004). A Comparative Analysis of Community Youth Development Strategies.

Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New directions for youth development, 2002(96), 27-46.

Griffin, C. (2004). Good girls, bad girls: Anglocentrism and diversity in the constitution of contemporary girlhood. All about the girl: Culture, power and identity, 29-44.

Hart, R.A. (2013). Children’s Participation: The Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizensin Community Development and Environmental Care, Routledge

Hemmati, M. (2002). Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict.

Hess, P. (2010). A sustainable development metric based on youth, Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, pp.542–551

Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (2001). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 435-458.

Justinianno, J., & Scherer, C. (2001). Youth voice: A guide for engaging youth in leadership and decision – making in service-learning programs. Washington, DC: Points of Light Foundation.

Kreps, S.E., Mariéthoz, E., Bakonyi, M. and Polla, B.S. (1999). Effects of ageing populations on individual and global sustainable development: A bio-demographical perspective, The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, pp.122–134

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575

Noor, M.F.M., Persekutuan, W. and Hassan, N. (2015). Beliefs, knowledge, values and youth’s engagement towards campus sustainability.

Pittman, K. (1991). Promoting youth development: strengthening the role of youth serving and community organizations, Paper prepared for USDA, Extension Service, National Youth at Risk Initiative Task Force.

Print, M. (2007). Citizenship education and youth participation in democracy. British journal of educational studies, 55(3), 325-345.

Riemer, M., Lynes, J. and Hickman, G. (2014). A model for developing and accessing youth-based environmental engagement programmes, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.812721, Routledge

Sadusky, H. (2014). College Student Perception & Behavior towards Sustainability: Results of a Campus Survey

Scholte, J. A. (2000). Cautionary reflections on Seattle. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 115-121.

Šlaus, I., & Jacobs, G. (2011). Human capital and sustainability. Sustainability, 3(1), 97-154.

Steckler, A. and Goodman, R.M. (1989). How to institutionalize health promotion programs, American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 34–43.

Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Wilderness challenge programs for delinquent youth: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. Evaluation and program planning, 23(1), 1-12.

Zeldin, S., Camino, L. and Calvert, M. (2007). Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: policy priorities and research directions, Análise Psicológica, pp.77–95


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Editorial Office:

Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,
S.N. 21, Plot No 24, Mirza Ghalib Road Malegaon Nasik,
Maharashtra India - 423203.
+919764558895 (whatsapp),
editor@scholarshub.net, www.scholarshub.net

Copyrights © 2010-2020 - ERM Publications, India     

This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/