An Exploratory Study on Malaysian Consumer’s Purchase Intention: Brand, Quality and Price Perspective

Muhammad Sabbir Rahman ., Ahasanul Haque .

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to find out the important determinants that are influencing consumers’ purchase intention under the perspective of brand, quality and price. This study also highlighted some propositions to guide future empirical research. The survey instruments were employed on 300 multiethnic (Malay, Chinese, and Indian) customers’ from Klang Valley area in Malaysia by following convenience sampling method. To test the hypothesis for the proposed model Multiple Regression were applied. Except price the coefficients of all explanatory variables are statistically significant and exhibit their expected signs.  It was found that the Malaysian customer’s purchase the products that are in high brand name and quality category. It is hoped that the findings of this study may assist the national and multinational companies in terms of production and promotion of their goods and services. So the national or multinational companies can minimize the chances of losing existing and potential customers’ which will help them for achieving competitive advantage in the market place. This research used convenience sampling procedure which is the main limitation of this research. Future research has suggested using stratified random sampling procedure with more samples. The added value of this paper is to link between theory and practice by exploring the significant factors that are influencing Malaysian customers’ perception to choice any products from the marketplace.


Keywords


Malaysian Consumers’, Brand, Price, Quality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.

All about Brands Index. (2005). Retrieved Sept. 15, 2005 from, All about Brands Website from www.allaboutbranding.com/index.lasso

Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1999). Strategies for building consumer brand preference. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(2), 130-144.

Ataman, B., & Ülengin, B. (2003). A note on the effect of brand image on sales. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 12(4), 237-250.

Beaudoin, P., Moore, M. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2000). Fashion leaders' and followers' attitudes toward buying domestic and imported apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18(1), 56.

Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. (1982). Country of origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 88-89.

Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J.W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, March, 474.

Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2001). Managing customer-initiated contacts with manufacturers: The impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, August, 281-97.

Boyer, K. K., & Hult, G. T. (2005). Customer behavior in an online ordering application: A decision scoring model. Decision Sciences, 36(4), 569-598.

Bristow, D. N., Schneider, K. C., & Schuler, D. K. (2002). The brand dependence scale: Measuring consumers’ use of brand name to differentiate among product alternatives. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(6), 343-356.

Brucks, M., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions. Working Paper, 91-130. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute

Crosby, L. B., DeVito, R., & Pearson, J. M. (2003). Manage your customers’ perception of quality. Review of Business, 24, 18-38.

Curry, D. J., & Riesz, P. C. (1988). Prices and price/quality relationships: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 36-51.

Department of Statistics, Malaysia. from http://www.statistics.gov.my

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.

Draganska, M., & Jain, D. C. (2003). Consumer preferences and product-line pricing strategies: An empirical analysis. Conference Paper, Marketing Science Conference, Maryland. Retrieved 28, Jan. 2005, from http://faculty-gsb.stanford.edu/draganska/PDF_Files/1linelength_FL61.pdf

Edwards, C. (1997). Malaysia: Physical and social geography The Far East and Australasia (28 ed., pp. 572-590): Europa Publications Ltd, London.

Enis, B., & Stafford, J. E. (1969). Influence of price and store information upon product quality perception. Southern Journal of Business, 4 (April), 90-94.

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers' connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339-348.

Foxall, G. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1994). Consumer psychology for marketing: Perceptual process.

Fugate, D. L. (1986). The effects of manufacturer disclosure on consumer perceptions of private brand grocery product attributes. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20(1), 118-130.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis (3rd edition). Macmillan, New York.

Hsieh, A. D., & Tung, C. L. L. (2008). The moderating effect of brand image on public relations perception and customer loyalty. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(1), 26-42.

Huffman, C., & Cain, L. B. (2001). Adjustments in performance measures: Distributive and procedural justice effects on outcome satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 18(6), 593-615.

International Financial Statistics. from http://www.imfstatistics.org

Johnson, W. C., & Sirikit, Anuchit. (2002). Service quality in the Thai telecommunication industry: A tool for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. Management Decision, 40(7), 693-701.

Jones, J. M., & Zufryden, F. S. (1980). Adding explanatory variables to a consumer purchase behavior model: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 323-334.

Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., & Sugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 251-262.

Kollmann, T. (2000). The price acceptance function: Perspectives of a pricing policy in European telecommunication markets. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(1), 7-14.

Lattin, J. M., & Bucklin, R. E. (1989). Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 299-310.

Leisen, B., &Vance, C. (2001). Cross-national assessment of service quality in the telecommunication industry: Evidence from the USA and Germany. Managing Service Quality, 11(5), 307-317.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234-245.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Mentor in Levinson,

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 55(August), 10-25.

Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

O’Cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88.

Ofir, C. (2004). Reexamining latitude of price acceptability and price thresholds: Predicting basic consumer reaction to price. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 612-621.

Paul (2000). McLuhan and Media Ecology, Proceedings of Media Ecology Association, Vol. 1, Retrieved Dec. 12, 2003, from http://www.mediaecology. org/publications/proceedings/v1/levinson01.pdf.

Plamer, A., & O’Neill, M. (2003). The effects of perceptual processes on the measurement of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(3), 254-274.

Raman, K., & Frank, M. B. (1988). A general test of reference price theory in the presence of threshold effects. [Working paper].

Solomon, M. R. (2009). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

Tellis, G. J., & Gaeth, G. J. (1990). Best value, price-seeking, and price aversion: The impact of information and learning on consumer choices. The Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 34-45.

Trebing, H. M. (2001). Emerging market structures and options for regulatory reform in public utility industries. In Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practices, Editor William H. Melody. Reprint 2001, Schultz DocuCenter, Denmark.

Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2003). Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 453-63.

Wal, R. W. E., Van der, Pampallis, A., & Bond, C. (2002). Service quality in a cellular telecommunications company: A South African experience. Managing Service Quality, 12(5), 323-335.

Wang, Y. G., & Lo, H. P. (2002). Service quality, customer satisfaction and behavior intentions: Evidence from China’s telecommunication industry. Inf. 4(6), 50-60.

Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair: A conceptual framework of price unfairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68, October, 1-15.

Wang, C. L., Siu, N. Y. M., & Hui, A. S. Y. (2004). Consumer decision-making styles on domestic and imported brand clothing. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 239-252.

Winer, R. S. (1986). A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. The Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 250-256.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Editorial Office:

Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,
S.N. 21, Plot No 24, Mirza Ghalib Road Malegaon Nasik,
Maharashtra India - 423203.
+919764558895 (whatsapp),
editor@scholarshub.net, www.scholarshub.net

Copyrights © 2010-2020 - ERM Publications, India     

This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/